The Role of PolitiFact in the 2012
Election
Martin Center,
University of Akron
105 Fir Hill, Akron
11:45 AM
Thursday,
November 29, 2012
|
People still care
about the facts in our political campaigns, according to Robert Higgs,
editor of Politifact Ohio at the Cleveland Plain Dealer. As an example, he
noted that the Politifact website received over 20,000 hits in an hour and a
half after the second presidential debate, with people fact-checking Mitt
Romney’s statement that oil production had declined on public lands.
At a meeting on
November 29 at the University of Akron’s Martin Center, co-sponsored by the
Akron Press Club, the Bliss Institute of Applied Politics, and LWVAA, Higgs
explained how the process works. Statements are chosen by reporters and
editors based on what is interesting to them, or that may sound implausible.
In a process that may take several days, reporters go to the source of the
statement and get their references, and then cross check with unbiased
sources such as the Census Bureau or the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A panel
of three editors then reviews this information and grades the statement
anywhere from “True” to “Pants on Fire.”
In the past election,
the Senate race between Josh Mandel and Sherrod Brown provided a good deal
of fodder for Politifact, with both campaigns—and the groups that supported
them — earning ratings of “pants on fire.”
Asked by an audience
member who would do such political fact checking if newspapers don't, Higgs
responded that he didn’t know. This was an especially relevant question
considering the cloud of uncertainty hanging over the future of the Plain
Dealer as an “everyday” daily paper. He didn’t believe the average person
would have the training, knowledge or time to do the research themselves.
Considering how fast
and loose political campaigns, and especially the shadowy SuperPacs, have
become with the facts, let’s hope Politifact is around for a long time to
come! |